Reactivation of minimal change disease after Pfizer vaccine against COVID-19.

This case follows a 54-year-old woman with a medical history of hypertension who experienced reactivation of minimal change disease (MCD) after receiving the Pfizer vaccine against COVID-19. She had her first episode of MCD 15 days after receiving the influenza vaccine in 2018. She remained in remission for over 3 years following treatment with steroids. She experienced foamy urine and leg edema after receiving the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine, but she did not consult medical professionals until she received the second dose. She wanted to be fully vaccinated because she worked in healthcare. Her initial diagnosis of MCD in 2018 was made following a kidney biopsy. The diagnosis of reactivation following COVID-19 vaccine was made with labs and presenting symptoms. At presentation, her urine protein was 9,977 mg/day. She was treated with prednisone 50 mg/day following her relapse with improvement in her urine protein to 85 mg/g within 4 weeks of starting treatment. She is currently undergoing treatment with prednisone with improvement in her presenting symptoms, which included foaming of urine and edema of legs. This case demonstrates the importance of vigilance in patients with a history of MCD when receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, particularly if they have a history of such reactions to other vaccines. Patients should discuss the benefits and risks of receiving the vaccine with their medical professionals and stay cognizant about the possibility of reactivation after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.

A de novo case of minimal change disease following the first dose of the Moderna mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine without relapse after the second dose.

In recent times, new onset or relapse of nephrotic syndrome following the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been reported. Although the vaccination could trigger nephrotic syndrome, the question of whether the same vaccine should be administered as the second dose remains unanswered. A 25-year-old woman had taken the Moderna mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (mRNA-1273) and 26 days later, she noticed facial and peripheral edema. One week later she was referred and admitted to our hospital, wherein laboratory tests revealed that her serum creatinine level, serum albumin level, and urine protein-creatinine ratio were respectively 0.79 mg/dL, 2.5 g/dL, and 7.0 g/gCr. After a thorough inpatient examination including renal biopsy, she was diagnosed with minimal change disease (MCD) and treatment with steroids was initiated. She achieved complete remission the next day and did not experience a relapse upon receiving the second mRNA-1273 dose 56 days after the first, under treatment with 35 mg/day of oral prednisolone. This case report yields insight into determining whether patients who develop de novo MCD after the first mRNA-1273 dose should receive the second dose.

Minimal Change Disease Following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.

We report on the development of minimal change disease (MCD) with nephrotic syndrome and acute kidney injury (AKI), shortly after first injection of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). A 50-year-old previously healthy man was admitted to our hospital following the appearance of peripheral edema. Ten days earlier, he had received the first injection of the vaccine. Four days after injection, he developed lower leg edema, which rapidly progressed to anasarca. On admission, serum creatinine was 2.31 mg/dL and 24-hour urinary protein excretion was 6.9 grams. As kidney function continued to decline over the next days, empirical treatment was initiated with prednisone 80 mg/d. A kidney biopsy was performed and the findings were consistent with MCD. Ten days later, kidney function began to improve, gradually returning to normal. The clinical triad of MCD, nephrotic syndrome, and AKI has been previously described under a variety of circumstances, but not following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The association between the vaccination and MCD is at this time temporal and by exclusion, and by no means firmly established. We await further reports of similar cases to evaluate the true incidence of this possible vaccine side effect.